mikekn: (Default)
[personal profile] mikekn
I spotted the results of one of these over in [livejournal.com profile] anglicub's journal, so I thought I'd track one down and try it (not sure if it's what he used or if there are others out there).


http://beliefnet.com/story/76/story_7665_1.html

Interesting, but not too surprising:

1. Secular Humanism (100%)
2. Unitarian Universalism (98%)
3. Liberal Quakers (89%)
4. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (82%) - This one was a bit of a surprise actually, but it probably means my view of this group is off.
5. Nontheist (73%)
6. Neo-Pagan (70%)
7. Theravada Buddhism (70%)
8. Taoism (57%)
9. New Age (55%)
10. Bahá'í Faith (49%)
11. Orthodox Quaker (45%)
12. Reform Judaism (45%)
13. Mahayana Buddhism (44%)
14. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (42%)
15. Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (38%)
16. New Thought (33%)
17. Sikhism (30%)
18. Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (29%)
19. Scientology (29%)
20. Jainism (28%)
21. Jehovah's Witness (26%)
22. Seventh Day Adventist (21%)
23. Hinduism (15%)
24. Eastern Orthodox (12%)
25. Islam (12%)
26. Orthodox Judaism (12%)
27. Roman Catholic (12%)

Protestants

Date: 2004-01-18 02:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metageek.livejournal.com

No, I think the program's view of Protestants is off. I reported that there is no God, prayer is useless, etc., and it listed a "Mainline to Liberal Protestant" score of 86% for me. I said that prayer should not take priority over actual medical treatment, and it listed a Christian Science score of 67%.



All I can guess is that the programmer was really sloppy. Either that, or their agenda was actually to convince people that they're religious, so they skewed the percentages upwards.

Page generated Sep. 18th, 2025 03:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios